Have you ever noticed the majority of visitors to your blog only comment on your most recent post? Even your loyal readers aren’t digging to find more of your writings.
If they are, they often don’t comment.
Why is that?
Today’s Lesson
As bloggers we’re continually publishing new posts.
As our new posts are pinged, our RSS feed readers/visitors come on over, may leave us a comment, and leave.
Many may not take time to read more than the current post, leaving our older posts buried in our archives collecting dust.
Much of what may actually be our best writings gets forgotten.
When I look at my blog, I’ve written over 300 posts.
The ones that are most popular (based on comments) are listed in my sidebar under “What Others Are Reading”. I also include my recently written posts, related posts and most recently, random posts (lower left sidebar).
I try to make it easy for my readers to find previous posts, however, it’s rare I get a comment on an older post. When I do, it’s often the result of a search engine “find” or an inbound link (to an older post).
With that being said, I’ve come to the realization if our current post doesn’t hold value, we could lose visitors.
What if your most recent post isn’t your best, or even most popular post?
Might a reader show up, and never come back?
I believe sometimes they do.
Today’s Assignment
If you look at your current blog post from the eyes of a visitor, what do they see? Keep in mind, RSS readers are not necessarily coming in on your home page. Often they are only seeing the “post” page.
How easy would it be for them to find older posts of yours if they chose to “dig around” your blog?
Are you seeing this trend too? Visitors comment on your current posts, but your older posts go untouched?
How do you entice your visitors to “dig”?
Photo Credit: Just Taken Pics’ photostream Tags: Blogging, digg, feed reader, feed readers, rss reader




Hi. I'm Barbara Swafford and I'd like to welcome you to the Blogging Without A Blog (BWAB) virtual blogging classroom. We'll make you think, share some links, and listen to what you have to say. Grab a chair and join in the conversation. 






I happened to be analyzing this today. In general, I think there’s a narrow window of opportunity where posts are ripe for comments. At some point, while you could still comment, the buffet was yesterday, or last week.
An interesting distinction between blogs and Wikis is that wikis are timeless. While you can try to create a timeless blog, fundamentally, time is a first class citizen.
This sort of sucks for me since I’m using a blog for sharing *timeless* book nuggets. That said, for RSS, I think having “related posts” helps. On the blog, I think showcasing popular posts and making the search box convenient helps. Tag clouds can be helpful and so can well-structured categories, but really I find the dominant scenarios are Web search, or feed reading. For me, since I know what’s inside, search and archives have been priceless.
Since I use my blog each day with my mentees, it’s forced me to find better ways to share my nuggets. In a recent experiment, I started adding consolidation pages (for example, Feeling Good Nuggets - http://thebookshare.blogspot.com/2008/05/feeling-good-book-nuggets.html). This lets me quickly share a collection of relevant posts with folks at work. I’m still in the process of adding browsing by book to my navbar, but now readers are asking me for browse by author.
I’m also starting my research to figure out which social tools help rehydrate and share past gems the best. At the end of the day, I think author pages organizing key posts can really help users dig through a blog.
J.D. Meiers last blog post..Develop Disagreement Rather Than Consensus