<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My &#8220;Blogging Buddies&#8221; Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 08:55:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Swafford</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-88979</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Swafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-88979</guid>
		<description>Hi Mathews,

Thank you for dropping by, for your comment and for your kind words. I hope you continue to enjoy that which I share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mathews,</p>
<p>Thank you for dropping by, for your comment and for your kind words. I hope you continue to enjoy that which I share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathews Drenalin</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-88891</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathews Drenalin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-88891</guid>
		<description>Not so long ago I wandered across this website and have been reading along. I decided I would give my opening comment. Im not sure exactly what to say except that Ive enjoyed perusing. Interesting blog. I intend to continue coming back to this blog now and again.  I have also got your feed for any updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so long ago I wandered across this website and have been reading along. I decided I would give my opening comment. Im not sure exactly what to say except that Ive enjoyed perusing. Interesting blog. I intend to continue coming back to this blog now and again.  I have also got your feed for any updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-890</guid>
		<description>Hello Catherine,

Linking gets pretty confusing.  As I was researching linking, that&#039;s when I ran across &quot;link farming&quot;.  As much as I am not too concerned about having my blogging buddies classified as a link farm, with under 30 links, I do wonder what would happen if I had 3000.  

Then too, we are depending on computer generated search engines to visit out site, so if a computer &quot;bot&quot; sees a long page of links, I don&#039;t see how they would have the capability of determining it&#039;s not a link farm.  

Inbound links can not be controlled by a site, but it seems like if you had a lot of spammy links coming in, that could degrade your site.  Maybe not with Google, but with your readers.  

I&#039;m trying to maintain a quality site, and as mentioned before, I won&#039;t resort to buying links.  I feel, in time, I will get more incoming quality links, and with that, page rank will follow.  

I don&#039;t want to do anything to jeopardize the sites of my loyal readers either, so unless I figure out another method of listing my blogging buddies, my links to them will continue to individual links, in posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Catherine,</p>
<p>Linking gets pretty confusing.  As I was researching linking, that&#8217;s when I ran across &#8220;link farming&#8221;.  As much as I am not too concerned about having my blogging buddies classified as a link farm, with under 30 links, I do wonder what would happen if I had 3000.  </p>
<p>Then too, we are depending on computer generated search engines to visit out site, so if a computer &#8220;bot&#8221; sees a long page of links, I don&#8217;t see how they would have the capability of determining it&#8217;s not a link farm.  </p>
<p>Inbound links can not be controlled by a site, but it seems like if you had a lot of spammy links coming in, that could degrade your site.  Maybe not with Google, but with your readers.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to maintain a quality site, and as mentioned before, I won&#8217;t resort to buying links.  I feel, in time, I will get more incoming quality links, and with that, page rank will follow.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to do anything to jeopardize the sites of my loyal readers either, so unless I figure out another method of listing my blogging buddies, my links to them will continue to individual links, in posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Lawson</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Hi Barbara - Unfortunately, a lot of those link farms aren&#039;t penalized - at least the sites they link to aren&#039;t.   They are usually v spammy sites and the site they&#039;re linking to bears little resemblance in content.

I know this because I searched what sites were linking to many of my competitors sites, and a lot were link farms.  Yet some of the competitors had PR6.

Now whether the farms are penalised is another matter.  But, I think that what does matter is that the links from your site are relevant to the content on the site you&#039;re linking to.

To me, it all seems very complicated.  They say that lots of inbound links can give you a higher PR - yet they also say that a high PR won&#039;t make your site rank highly in the search engines.  So, I just don&#039;t understand why it matters so much.

Then I hear about people paying for links and I have to wonder why they&#039;re doing that if it won&#039;t give them a higher ranking.  It seems nobody knows for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barbara &#8211; Unfortunately, a lot of those link farms aren&#8217;t penalized &#8211; at least the sites they link to aren&#8217;t.   They are usually v spammy sites and the site they&#8217;re linking to bears little resemblance in content.</p>
<p>I know this because I searched what sites were linking to many of my competitors sites, and a lot were link farms.  Yet some of the competitors had PR6.</p>
<p>Now whether the farms are penalised is another matter.  But, I think that what does matter is that the links from your site are relevant to the content on the site you&#8217;re linking to.</p>
<p>To me, it all seems very complicated.  They say that lots of inbound links can give you a higher PR &#8211; yet they also say that a high PR won&#8217;t make your site rank highly in the search engines.  So, I just don&#8217;t understand why it matters so much.</p>
<p>Then I hear about people paying for links and I have to wonder why they&#8217;re doing that if it won&#8217;t give them a higher ranking.  It seems nobody knows for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithoutablog.com/my-blogging-buddies-update/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>Hi Kekoa,

I fixed the typo.  Thanks for pointing that out to me.  

I&#039;m not sure if my blogging buddies page would have been (when I included links),  considered a link farm, however, based on some of the definitions, I don&#039;t want to take the risk.    

Looking into the future, when that page could include thousands of links to sites, a good deed could be misconstrued.  That is what I don&#039;t want to take a chance on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kekoa,</p>
<p>I fixed the typo.  Thanks for pointing that out to me.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if my blogging buddies page would have been (when I included links),  considered a link farm, however, based on some of the definitions, I don&#8217;t want to take the risk.    </p>
<p>Looking into the future, when that page could include thousands of links to sites, a good deed could be misconstrued.  That is what I don&#8217;t want to take a chance on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

